Assertion 1
TechCrunch AI Don't Worry About the Vase The consensus read is reasonable: when the people building these systems put the odds above 10%, you take them at their word and expect a slowdown.
Assertion status: No spot-check verdict is published for this assertion.
Jacob Coxon, an Anthropic researcher, resigned from his position due to fears that unrestrained development of self-improving AI could lead to human extinction.
No stored spot-check names this claim in this edition.
Jacob Coxon asserted that AI developers at OpenAI and Anthropic earnestly believe that superintelligent AI could kill all humans by the end of the decade.
No stored spot-check names this claim in this edition.
Evan Hubinger, a colleague of Coxon at Anthropic, stated that his team earnestly believes AI could kill all humans, estimating the likelihood at greater than 10% within the next decade.
No stored spot-check names this claim in this edition.
Jacob Coxon, a former researcher at Anthropic and OpenAI, resigned from Anthropic in September 2026 to protest what he describes as the irresponsible race toward self-improving superintelligence.
No stored spot-check names this claim in this edition.
Jacob Coxon warned that AI systems could be out of control by the end of the following year, which is 2027.
No stored spot-check names this claim in this edition.
Evan Hubinger, the Alignment Science Lead at Anthropic, stated that he personally believes the chance of AI killing all humans is greater than 10% within the next decade.
No stored spot-check names this claim in this edition.
Samuel Marks, an Anthropic researcher, stated that AI developers believe their technology could cause human extinction or similarly bad outcomes in the next few years.
No stored spot-check names this claim in this edition.